January 17th 2023

National Anti-Money Laundering Committee to apply for a re-rating

by NCPC

SAINT LUCIA STRENGTHENS ITS MONEY LAUNDERING PREVENTION LEGISLATION.

Saint Lucia is in the process of revising its National Risk Assessment ahead of an application for re-rating in November 2023.

The National Anti-Money Laundering Oversight Committee (NAMLOC) has sought to strengthen the country’s capacity to combat money laundering, terrorist, and proliferation financing.  One of the mandates of NAMLOC is to review Saint Lucia’s legislative framework in relation to money laundering and propose the necessary amendments to existing legislation and enactment of new legislation to close existing gaps.

Money Laundering is a serious and growing issue globally. The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime estimates that between 2% and 5 % of global GDP is laundered, this amounts to $800 million to $2 trillion annually. Juliana Alfred, Permanent Secretary in the Attorney General’s Chambers and Chair of the National Anti-Money Laundering Oversight Committee (NAMLOC) explained that NAMLOC, which is an inter-sectoral committee set up by the Cabinet of Ministers, is actively working to monitor and mitigate the risks posed to the various sectors within Saint Lucia by money laundering, terrorist and proliferation financing.

“So, all of this work that the committee is doing is with the intension that towards the end of this year Saint Lucia will be applying for re-rating to remove us from enhanced follow-up because currently, we are under enhanced follow-up because of all of these deficiencies.”

Kozel Creese is the Senior Crown Counsel in the AG’s Chambers and Deputy Chair of NAMLOC. She said Saint Lucia has been sighted as falling short on some of the forty standards set by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) which is the inter-governmental policymaking body established to set international standards to combat money laundering, terrorist, and proliferation financing.

“Saint Lucia would have been graded on each of these rules. So, from our standpoint, we were partially compliant in at least twenty-two and non-compliant in eight. Some of the things I would identify in terms of our risks; one of the suggestions of the Mutual Evaluation Report is that Saint Lucia must be able to sufficiently identify its Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing risk and must be able to allocate resources in terms of which are the higher risker areas and which are the low-risk areas.”

She added that Saint Lucia’s Anti-Money Laundering legislation must also ensure that there is sufficient, dissuasive, and proportionate sanctioning for persons who breach the Money Laundering Prevention Act.

“Specifically in relation to Non-Profit Organisations (NPOs), they considered that these organizations are off course higher risk however St. Lucia has not addressed in terms of which subset of these NPOs would be a higher risk for money laundering or terrorist financing.”

Though compliance to the international standards is “voluntary” the economic ramifications for deliberate non-compliance can be catastrophic, with countries facing being grey or blacklisted or even losing correspondent banking privileges.

TO RECEIVE NEWS NOTIFICATIONS VIA WHATS APP PLEASE SAVE OUR NUMBER AND SEND US A MESSAGE AT 7584896261 AND WE WILL ADD YOU TO OUR LIST